Critic of the Kohlberg model due to the fact that the research subjects
were all male. Gilligan contests that women develop a different sense of
morality termed care perspective based around connectedness or relationships
with others, interpersonal communications, and concern or empathy for those
they are surrounded by. Gilligan
proposes that women have a difficult time viewing their morality in connection
with the law b/c law is not personable.
Gilligan also proposes that women tend to sacrifice the well-being of
themselves for the good of those they are committed to (whether in friendship,
family, or intimate relationship). Gilligan also created levels of moral
development:
Level 1: Orientation to Personal Survival – focus on woman’s
self-interest (much like the start of Kohlberg’s model)
Transition 1:
Transition from personal Selfishness to Responsibility – a woman realizes that
she is not only responsible for herself, but also for other (unborn or not).
Realizes her choices impact others
Level 2: Goodness as Self-Sacrifice – woman sacrifices well-being of self
for well-being of others; dependent on what others think and think about her
Transition 2: From
Goodness to Reality – some of the personal self-interest returns but is more
objective – include self – considers what is in the best interests of everyone
Level 3: The Morality of Nonviolent Responsibility – weights consequences
of\ actions and accepts she will be responsible; hence, tends to make decisions
more on her own w/o regard as to how others will view her
Zastrow, C.H. & Kirst-Ashman, K.K. (2004). Understanding Human Behavior. Thomson Learning, Inc., Belmont, CA. p. 262-264.
Zastrow, C.H. & Kirst-Ashman, K.K. (2004). Understanding Human Behavior. Thomson Learning, Inc., Belmont, CA. p. 262-264.
No comments:
Post a Comment